{"id":12556,"date":"2026-01-13T17:40:42","date_gmt":"2026-01-13T16:40:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dhc.ima.vc\/annex-11-und-outsourcing-der-validierung\/"},"modified":"2026-05-09T23:51:42","modified_gmt":"2026-05-09T21:51:42","slug":"annex-11-and-validation-outsourcing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dhc.ima.vc\/en\/annex-11-and-validation-outsourcing\/","title":{"rendered":"Annex 11 in motion: How Outsourcing Validation Activities can be efficient and compliant"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Annex 11 in motion: How Outsourcing Validation Activities can be efficient and compliant<\/h1>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

View the EU GMP Annex 11 draft as an opportunity: away from one-time validations toward a risk-based lifecycle with requirements for security, data integrity, periodic review, and cloud governance. This article shows why classical CSV reaches its limits, how outsourcing provides relief, and how requirements can be implemented in a practical and audit-proof manner.<\/p><\/div>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\"Picture\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDr. Wolfgang Schumacher, DGQ Auditor & Anke Ziska, Practice Manager Managed Validation Services, DHC GmbH\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"Why\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Why the New Draft of Annex 11 is a Milestone<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

With the publication of the revised draft of EU GMP Annex 11 in July 2025, regulated companies are receiving significantly more specific and up-to-date requirements for computerized systems. The new version, which alongside Annex 11 also includes the revised Chapter 4 (Documentation) and the entirely new EU GMP Annex 22 for AI systems, responds to a fundamental shift in computerized systems: cloud applications, SaaS solutions, hybrid IT landscapes, strong system integration, agile implementation, artificial intelligence and increasing cyber risks.
The draft of the new Annex 11 now comprises 17 main chapters plus a glossary and is structured considerably more comprehensively than the previous version. In addition to deepening existing topics such as System Requirements, Supplier & Service Management, Electronic Signatures and Audit Trails, several new standalone chapters have been introduced, including Identity & Access Management, Alarms, Security, Handling of Data, Periodic Review, Backup and Archiving. This means regulatory expectations are not only made more specific, but are also tightened in many areas.<\/p>

In terms of content, the draft represents a clear paradigm shift away from a predominantly project-based system validation toward a holistic lifecycle and governance approach for computerized systems. Regulatory compliance is no longer primarily defined through one-time qualification and testing activities, but through continuously effective technical and organizational control mechanisms that ensure secure and compliant operation throughout the entire lifecycle. These include, in particular, binding requirements for cybersecurity, such as protective measures against unauthorized access, vulnerability management and the handling of security-relevant events, as well as a clearly regulated identity and access management with role-based access control, segregation of duties and the consistent avoidance of shared user accounts.
At the same time, audit trail and data integrity requirements are significantly tightened. All GMP-relevant activities must be fully, traceably and tamper-proof documented, so that changes, deletions and access can be audited at any time and regulatory expectations for transparency and traceability are met. Additionally, the draft tightens the requirements for outsourced IT and GxP-relevant services. Companies remain explicitly responsible for the compliance of their systems and must qualify service providers on a risk basis, establish clear contractual agreements on responsibilities, service levels and reporting obligations, and ensure that adequate support during audits and inspections is guaranteed.<\/p>

Systems must therefore be reviewed regularly throughout their entire lifecycle and continuously assessed with regard to security, data integrity, backup, archiving and configuration management. A validated system is no longer considered a completed state, but rather a continuously managed and monitored process.
For companies, this means: anyone who wants to work in a GxP-compliant and modern manner today must rethink validation, operations, security and documentation and implement them in a significantly more integrated, structured and professionally governed manner.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Current Challenges in Regulated Environments: Digitalization and Cloud, More Dynamics, More Risk<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

The classic, locally installed software landscape is long gone. Today’s IT environments are characterized by cloud and SaaS systems, modular architectures, and frequent updates, particularly with complex ERP systems such as SAP S\/4HANA, as well as MES and LIMS systems. Every change, every update can have implications for validation, data integrity, or IT security.
In addition to advancing digitalization and migration to new technologies, regulatory requirements are increasing: The expectations of supervisory authorities regarding data integrity, cybersecurity, documentation, and traceability are growing continuously. All of this requires highly specialized IT and CSV personnel. Many companies, however, face a problem: internal specialists with CSV, security, or cloud expertise are scarce and cost-intensive, budgets for internal validation are often limited, yet at the same time the effort continues to grow.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Why Traditional CSV Approaches Are Reaching Their Limits<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t